The Legal Examiner Affiliate Network The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner search instagram avvo phone envelope checkmark mail-reply spinner error close The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner
Skip to main content

When Berks County infant Emma Takacs was taken by her family to the emergency room of Reading Hospital and Medical Center in Reading, Berks County, in December 2007, she was suffering from a 103-degree fever. Her doctor diagnosed her with a middle-ear infection and sent her home with antibiotics. The next morning she was worse, looking pale and acting lethargic. The family rushed her to her pediatrician’s office. She was later diagnosed with pneumococcal meningitis, hypoxic brain injury, and hydrocephalus—and died 21 months later of related complications.

In June 2013, a Berks County jury awarded $1.7 million to the family in a medical malpractice lawsuit. According to a recent study published in BMJ Open, missed diagnoses and drug errors are the most common reason patients sue their primary care doctors for medical malpractice. Missed or delayed diagnoses were cited most frequently in malpractice claims, and death was the most frequent patient outcome recorded.

Research Finds Doctor Errors

For the study, researchers from the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Medical School in Dublin reviewed 34 published studies of medical malpractice claims. Studies were included if they reported original data pertinent to malpractice claims, were based in primary care, and were published in the English language.

Of the studies reviewed, 15 were based in the U.S., 9 in the U.K., seven in Australia, one in Canada and two in France. Common missed or delayed diagnoses included cancer and myocardial infarction in adults and, as in Emma’s case, meningitis in children. Overall, in 43 percent of the errors, two or more clinicians were involved. In 16 percent of the errors, three or more were involved.

The study also illuminated just what mistakes the doctors made in coming to the wrong diagnosis. These included failure to obtain a diagnostic test (or misinterpreting the results), and failure to develop an adequate follow-up plan, obtain a complete history, or do a physical examination.

The second most common reason patients sued was medication errors, representing 5.6–20 percent of all claims.

Recoveries in Medical Malpractice Cases

Families that were paid typically received between $200,000 and $250,000 in the U.S. In the U.K., the payments were higher, often in excess of one million pounds.

In the Takacs case, ten out of the twelve jurors sided with the family’s claims that the doctor failed to diagnose the meningitis infection, agreeing that the standard of care required, at minimum, a blood count and urinalysis to rule out the possibility of the disease. The doctor was also found in error for not scheduling a follow-up visit within 24 to 48 hours, instructing the parents instead to bring the child back “as needed.”

The family received $860,000 for future lost earnings, and $860,000 for the child’s pain and suffering.


  1. Gravatar for jc

    Most medical malpractice suits are filed by incompetent, inexperienced, plaintiff attorneys, who are too incompetent to handle this complex litigation. This is why plaintiff attorneys lose 80-85% of their cases at trial, a failure rate unseen in American Industry.

  2. Gravatar for John Bedford
    John Bedford

    I see the troll gets all the med mal stories.

Comments for this article are closed.